Regarding specificity, the complexity is given because each activity must be evaluated from the point of view of the 5 criteria: environmental protection, climate change, sustainable operations & products, quality standards, and efficiency in the use of resources. If we talk about low-risk activities, so far, these can be evaluated by personnel who have general knowledge of the activity and general knowledge in environmental education. However, activities that present greater environmental risks, must be evaluated by expert personnel in the activity developed and expert personnel in the environmental area (general and specific), since each activity will require the participation of different experts according to the characteristics of the impact generated and its possible solutions, that is, each activity will have a different development with respect to each of the environmental criteria according to its incidence in the same.
It should be noted that with the challenge of zero emissions established internationally, the global trend is that each of the activities does not generate impact, so all activities must be evaluated, sooner or later, by only expert personnel in the activity, expert personnel in the environment and experts in the specific areas in which the impact is generated.